I am not sure why we need this comparison in the article any longer for the following reasons: Aswick 02:03, (UTC) -Preceding unsigned comment added by Aswick ( talk Today, the user interface is dated and there are "easier" and "more elegant" interfaces available in other products (see *Limitations* for more info). From the article: ".Like the iPod, Apple TV is simple to 's online store is not as elegant as iTunes." Should the statement be removed? Definitely, but not for the reasons you state, IMHO. Remember that 2 years ago, Apple set the standard. At the moment this looks to be subjective/ and to be advertising rather than objective 60.241.85.126 ( talk) 02:20, (UTC) Reply Not really. The beginning line of this section should be changed to "Apple Inc aims for", "Apple Inc says". putting double quotes around this statement and citing it does not make it less so.say what? this is subjective and should not be the beggining of a section.See change & comment 08:55 by Stephen Shaw. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:46, 25 November 2008 (UTC) Reply This info was originally included in the article, but was removed due to the content being based on conjecture/opinion. AlistairMcMillan ( talk) 21:39, 25 November 2008 (UTC) Reply Total agreement iSuppli isn't known for stunning accuracy. Anyway given that the Apple TV is basically a kiosk for the iTunes Store and that the concept of loss leaders is so well known that we even have an article for it ( loss leaders), I'm not really sure if this is worth noting. Not really the " reputation for fact-checking and accuracy" we are looking for. The iSuppli analyses are well known for being basically one step away from guesswork. contribs) 07:21, NovemThe Business Week article is based on analysis by iSuppli.This site includes lots of info so should this info be included? -Preceding unsigned comment added by Diaa abdelmoneim ( talk I don't know if this fits in Wikipedia but it seems that apple tv isn't entirely profitable. 56 A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion.55 A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion.51 Apple did not discontinue the 64Gb version of Apple TV 5th Generation (4K).49 A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion.48 A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion.45.3 3rd generation/3rd Generation Rev-A.27 Syncing only allowed on 1st gen Apple TVs.25 Additional Limitations including YouTube.18 How to integrate the big hardware changes?.15 Posting at WP:RSN about the Digital Power Management discussion.This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Computing Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing Template:WikiProject Computing Computing articles If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. | b1 = | b2 = | b3 = | b4 = | b5 = | b6 = Īssessing the article against each criterion. This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Apple TV was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |